Revista de Ciencias de la Salud

  • ISSN: 1108-7366
  • Índice h de la revista: 51
  • Puntuación de cita de revista: 10.69
  • Factor de impacto de la revista: 9.13
Indexado en
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Infraestructura Nacional de Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL Completa
  • cimago
  • Biblioteca de revistas electrónicas
  • Directorio de indexación de revistas de investigación (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Comisión de Becas Universitarias
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la Educación e Investigación Médica
  • pub europeo
  • Google Académico
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Laboratorios secretos de motores de búsqueda
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Methods of Ergonomic Evaluation in Upper Limb: A Review in Agricultural Manual Work

Castaneda LAG, Baquero WAH, Araujo WGG, Isaza SJ and Olaya AFR

Background: Into literary collections exists a great availability of kinematic models for upper limbs; e.g. for shoulder modeling, were found that the number of published articles, since 1990 to 2009, can reach 100. Aims: To describe the main ergonomic methods adopted to evaluate the upper limb in manual agricultural work and the quality of available evidence in electronic databases. Methods: A search in scientific literature made through Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ESBCO - PubMed and IEEE databases. At the same time, in systematically classified and published articles during the period 2013 to 2018, based on Delphi consensus criteria and evidences analyzed under PRISMA declaration criteria and catalogued in accordance with the approaches of physical ergonomics. Papers selection had basis on the key words: farmers, musculoskeletal, farmers' upper limb, agricultural risk factor, and occupational risk factor. Along this retrospective study, initially were found 1508 articles, where 37 of them were analyzed. All selected papers met rigor of inclusion criteria (specific farmer population without mechanical aid), and exclusion (duplicity or triplicate in databases, and intervention with clinical or medical examinations). Conclusion: Results showed that the most of evaluation techniques used are indirect: realized by self-administered questionnaires (SAQ) or self-reporting, this is an evidence of little ergonomic analysis in farmers doing manual work; most of the studies selected were catalogued as good or reasonable quality. This systematic review highlights the needing of adjusting tools in order to identify and evaluate potentially dangerous tasks by their movements and/or postures in real time.

Descargo de responsabilidad: este resumen se tradujo utilizando herramientas de inteligencia artificial y aún no ha sido revisado ni verificado