Revista de Ciencias de la Salud

  • ISSN: 1108-7366
  • Índice h de la revista: 51
  • Puntuación de cita de revista: 10.69
  • Factor de impacto de la revista: 9.13
Indexado en
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Infraestructura Nacional de Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • CINAHL Completa
  • cimago
  • Biblioteca de revistas electrónicas
  • Directorio de indexación de revistas de investigación (DRJI)
  • EMCare
  • OCLC-WorldCat
  • Comisión de Becas Universitarias
  • Fundación de Ginebra para la Educación e Investigación Médica
  • pub europeo
  • Google Académico
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Laboratorios secretos de motores de búsqueda
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

A Comparative Study between Sleeve Suture Technique and Oblique Cut Technique in Arterial Micro-Anastomosis of Size-Mismatched Vessels in a Rat Model

Fatma Youssef Ahmed*, Ebopras Febrbs1, Wael Sakr, Md, Wael Elshaer Md

Background: Microsurgical reconstruction is employed for complex plastic surgery problems when other options don't seem to be satisfactory either functional or aesthetic Aim: to evaluate sleeve suture technique and oblique cut technique in end-to-end micro-anastomosis of vessels with size discrepancy in a Rat model regarding patency of the anastomosis and feasibility of the technique

Methods: Thirteen Samples were included in this study and randomly assigned to either Group Ι (Sleeve suture technique) or Group Ι (Oblique cut technique). The main assessment parameters were anastomosis patency, time of anastomosis, and the number of suture units. Other parameters included anaesthesia consumption, thrombosis rate, and leakage after anastomosis.

Results: Nearly equal patency rates have been found in the two techniques in the animal model, although the invagination technique was faster and technically simpler to perform with less suture unit consumption. The oblique cut technique showed a highly statistically significant increase in the anastomosis time and an increased in sutures number in comparison to the sleeve technique plus the necessity to flip-flop the wall for posterior wall suturing.

Conclusion: No patency advantage of one technique over the other. However, in the experimental model used, it was found that the invagination technique was faster and technically simpler to perform. Flow-through the invagination was nearly equal to that through the oblique cut end-to-end.