Anales de investigación clínica y de laboratorio

  • ISSN: 2386-5180
  • Índice h de la revista: 17
  • Puntuación de cita de revista: 6.26
  • Factor de impacto de la revista: 5.31
Indexado en
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Infraestructura Nacional de Conocimiento de China (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Directorio de indexación de revistas de investigación (DRJI)
  • Publón
  • pub europeo
  • Google Académico
  • SHERPA ROMEO
  • Laboratorios secretos de motores de búsqueda
Comparte esta página

Abstracto

Diagnostic Laboratory Markers for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Toru Shizuma \r\n\r\n \\r\\n\\r\\n \r\n\r\n \\\\r\\\\n \r\n\r\n \\r\\n \r\n

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an often-lifethreatening bacterial infection in patients with liver cirrhosis with ascites. Useful laboratory methods for early diagnosis are essential. The gold standard method for the diagnosis of SBP is a polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count of ≥250 cells/mm3 in the ascitic fluid. Some studies have investigated the usefulness of other novel laboratory methods for the diagnosis of SBP. This paper reviews studies of diagnostic markers for SBP, such as procalcitonin, calprotectin, and leukocyte esterase reagent strips in ascitic fluid. At present, serum procalcitonin is a relatively sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of SBP. The usefulness of ascitic levels of procalcitonin and calprotectin for differentiating between SBP and sterile ascites is still uncertain because of the small number of studies. Although the sensitivity of leukocyte esterase reagent strips for diagnosing SBP is variable, a negative test result may predict absence of SBP.

\r\n\r\n

\\r\\n\\r\\n

\r\n\r\n

\\\\r\\\\n

\r\n\r\n

\\r\\n

\r\n

Descargo de responsabilidad: este resumen se tradujo utilizando herramientas de inteligencia artificial y aún no ha sido revisado ni verificado